Small c vs. big C: How Computational Infrastructures Capture Technical and Social Imaginary for Public Life

In recent years, the communications, sociality and operations of public institutions have become increasingly dependent on Computational Infrastructures provided by Big Tech. From decentralized contact tracing apps for public health to free online school classrooms for education: Computational Infrastructures have rapidly expanded their remit. This conversation will center on how institutions and the lives they are tasked with supporting, are impacted by Computational Infrastructures.

Owned and managed by a handful of companies, Computational Infrastructures consist of a vast global network of data centers, network infrastructures and mobile devices, as well as platforms that are becoming essential for the provision of economically viable and scalable digital services. Their inherent economic models and mandate to grow, require Big Tech companies to expand into all aspects of life, be it health management, border informatics, educational platforms, precision farming, or logistics. We want to grasp this moment of infrastructural shift and re-imagine it as a move towards collective empowerment: how can we engender shared responsibility, leverage creative resistance, and develop new ways of interfacing across scales, between communities and institutions?

Drawing on feminist, decolonial and intersectional analysis, The Institute for Technology in The Public Interest (TITiPI) has been studying how infrastructural shifts are changing institutional conditions that impact feminist organising and the lives of marginalised communities including people of color, women, trans and non-binary people. TITiPI is a trans-practice gathering of activists, artists, engineers and theorists initiated by Miriyam Aouragh, Seda Gürses, Helen Pritchard and Femke Snelting. Together we convene communities to hold computational infrastructures to account and to create spaces for articulating what technologies in the “public interest” might be when “public interest” is always in-the-making. We develop tools from feminisms, queer theory, computation, intersectionality, anti-coloniality, disability studies, historical materialism and artistic practice to generate currently inexistant vocabularies, imaginaries and methodologies. TITiPI functions as an infrastructure to intensify these practices and to establish new ways in which policy making around technology is organized in the public interest.

To find out more, please visit: http://titipi.org/

This session is the sixth edition of the ’Thinking through the Crises’ series of the Amsterdam Research Center for Gender and Sexuality (ARC-GS). Follow this link (https://arcgs.uva.nl/events/thinking-through-the-crises-lecture-series/thinking-through-the-crises.html) to read more about the series.

Gerelateerde programma’s
27 05 26
Public Problematisations of AI

How do we publicly problematise the role Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays in society to challenge its inevitability and imagine other ways of living with AI? This panel explores this question, as it invites leading researchers who critically engage with AI and its relation to the public to discuss their ongoing work. 

Datum
Woensdag 27 mei 2026 17:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25
24 11 25
50 jaar Surinaamse onafhankelijkheid in poëzie, literatuur en geschiedenis

Dit jaar vieren we 50 jaar Surinaamse onafhankelijkheid. Op de vooravond van Srefidensi Dey, Onafhankelijkheidsdag, nemen we vanuit verschillende perspectieven de Surinaamse wordingsgeschiedenis en identiteit onder de loep. Een avond waarin een grote variëteit aan Surinaamse stemmen klinkt, en we ons buigen over de betekenis van de Surinaamse onafhankelijkheid, toen en nu.

Datum
Maandag 24 nov 2025 20:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25
10 11 25
How the Netherlands received the European Convention on Human Rights​
​​The Convention and the Kingdom

The European Convention on Human Rights is nowadays one of the most prominent human rights treaties. In particular in the Netherlands, it has become the main legal tool for fundamental rights protection. As such, it has also found itself in the spotlight: pushback has developed against its perceived excessive constraining of political options and the European Court is being criticized for interference with domestic sensitivities.   

Datum
Maandag 10 nov 2025 20:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25